Friday, July 25, 2008

End of a Wild Week

  • Consumer sentiment comes in higher than expected. Durable
    goods orders come in higher than expected. NEW HOME SALES come in
    better than expected.
  • Today is a victory for low expectations, much more than a sign of
    recovering economy, but still, stocks are benefitting and bonds getting
    beat up. We had had a little rally, but we're losing ground today.
  • Of note: FHA conventional-to-FHA refinances have been put into
    the FHA Secure program, which was originally designed to allow
    delinquent homeowners to get out of their ARMs before they lose their
    homes. Obviously - OBVIOUSLY - lumping these two kinds of loans
    together is silly, as it takes good loans from responsible homeowners
    and prices them the same as risky loans to those missing payments.
    This costs good borrowers, no matter how good their credit, about .5%
    to their rate when refinancing to FHA.

  • There is, however, an exception, and it comes from Countrywide,
    of all people. That company has decided that it will not buy FHA
    Secure loans except when the homeowner has never been delinquent.
    Therefore they do not have to lump risky and good loans together,
    therefore they can offer better pricing, and it is that pricing that is
    reflected in the chart above.
  • Never thought I'd say it, but Countrywide is acting very smart. And it's a good thing for us.

Tuesday, July 22, 2008

At Least Oil Is Down Too

  • Bonds rallied yesterday a little, but have given back all that
    momentum and more today, so we're back to where we were Friday on
    rates. At least oil is falling - we're more than $18 off the high and
    still going.

  • There is a proposal out there being put together by a
    private/public consortium of mortgage people and government regulators
    that actually has some merit. It will be a couple of months before we
    get the full details, but right now it appears that what we're looking
    at is a plan to increase transparency in the packaging of mortgage
    loans so they can be purchased. This would add confidence to the
    secondary mortgage market, increase liquidity, and probably drive down
    rates, especially for good borrowers.
  • This is the technical part, so skip it if you don't care:
    mortgages are packaged in large groups for sale on the secondary
    market. Primary lenders have used this packaging to shed loans from
    the books and obtain new lending capital. However, up to the moment,
    the packages of loans have been fairly opaque; that is, the secondary
    financiers were never quite sure what it is they were buying. The
    packages of securitized loans were often significantly heterogeneous,
    and as the market has melted down, that has contributed to the
    distress, because the lending institutions that purchased these
    packages couldn't really tell what they were worth - they didn't know.


  • Some of the loans were fine, most of them, even, but many were
    not. How many? Nobody knew. Was this package better or worse than
    that one? Nobody knew. How much real exposure did the financier have
    to market downturn? Nobody knew.
  • To a large extent, nobody knows now, either, which is why the
    recent spate of better-than expected earnings from servicing banks has
    been such welcome news. At least we're pretty sure the entire
    portfolio isn't going to self-destruct.
  • This opacity does two things: one, it increases risk-based
    pricing for good loans (20%+ equity, 720 credit, full income
    documentation) while significantly decreasing pricing for bad loans,
    and two, it allows lenders to make riskier loans, because they can then
    package them with good ones and sell the whole shooting match as "A"
    credit mortgages.
  • You're right, this is stupid.
  • What this proposal would do, then, is make it much easier for an
    investor to tell what he was buying, because all the loans in any given
    package would share characteristics. This will increase liquidity,
    especially for good borrowers, and get some money moving in the
    mortgage market again. Rates will fall for less risky loans.
  • Rates will, of course, rise for more risky ones, which will
    emphasize things that need emphasizing, like having a job and some
    money in the bank, and a history of paying bills on time. That will be
    painful for some, but better on the whole for everyone.
  • Congress will then step in and prohibit risk-based pricing as
    being discriminatory, and the entire market will collapse. But we will
    have made a good try, and that's important.

Tuesday, July 15, 2008

FHA Guideline Changes

Rates today are the same as yesterday.



What I want to take a minute to do is acquaint you with some of the new
rules for FHA loans that will be effective August 1. These are
critical to many borrowers, as FHA loans are currently substantially
better both in interest rate and in underwriting flexibility than
conventional financing.



Previously:

No loans approved less than 2 years from bankruptcy.

As of August 1:

No loans approved less than 4 years from bankruptcy, unless significant extenuating circumstances can be proved.



Previously:

No loans approved less than 3 years from foreclosure

As of August 1:

No loans approved less than 7 years from foreclosure



Previously:

Rental income allowed to offset liability for residence being converted to investment property (when purchasing a new home)

As of August 1:

Rental income disallowed on conversion to investment, unless 30% equity in the property.



There are more in the same vein. Please be aware of these changes.
Additionally, FHA is changing LTV requirements, cashout requirements
and reserve requirements for most loans, and altering the up-front
mortgage insurance premium required, although in this case, it is true
that many borrowers will now pay less than they otherwise would have.
So it's not all bad news.



Stay tuned for more. And as always, call with questions (801-310-3407)
or hit reply and we can get you the information you need.



Cj

Tuesday, July 8, 2008

Extra! Extra!

You Read It Here First


  • Oil has lost over $8 the last two days. If the runup in crude
    oil prices is, as has been contended often, mostly driven by
    speculators and hysteria, let's all remember that hysteria works in
    both directions. On the upside, it's called "irrational exuberance".
    On the downside, it's called panic.
  • All commodities, actually, are down rather significantly from
    their highs, including precious metals and even corn and wheat. It
    appears that our capacity to grow things, find things, and innovate out
    of needing things is, in fact, expanding. Shocker.
  • Bonds are up, the stock market is down, and despite FNMA and
    FHLMC writing off another $42 billion in bad debt yesterday, both those
    stocks are up this morning and there isn't any apparent worry that the
    backbone of the mortgage system will collapse any time soon.
  • Fact is, the vast majority of homeowners will pay their bills on
    time and repay their mortgages on schedule. There's a lot of hysteria
    out there in the credit markets, but there are still good loans to be
    had, and lots of good people that need them. Lenders need to add
    really good loans to their portfolios, and are keeping rates relatively
    low to attract them.
  • Here's the prediction: the sky is not falling. Oil will not hit
    $150 a barrel this year. Gas will not reach $5 a gallon this year, or
    next year. Mortgage rates will not hit 7% this year or next year. By
    spring of next year there will be a significant, noticeable rally in
    real estate. The world financial system will not collapse. Innovation
    will explode.
  • You read it here first.

Cj


www.thechrisjonesgroup.com

Thursday, June 26, 2008

Fed Holds Firm

  • The Federal Reserve tried to have it both ways yesterday, leaving
    short-term rates right where they were, but talking about getting tough
    with inflation. That leaves the Fed rate at 2%, making the Prime Rate
    6%. As you know, because you are a faithful reader, Fed Rates and
    long-term mortgage rates do not have that much to do with one another.
  • The long bond traders hated the news initially, but the stock
    traders hated it even more and by the end of the day we were back flat
    and repricing to the better.
  • So this morning we have the first tick down in certain rates we've seen in a month.
  • National Association of Realtors data this morning shows a 2%
    increase in month-to-month sales volume for houses, most of that in the
    markets like Vegas and the coasts, where house prices have dropped
    significantly. But again, it's a sign of increasing activity.
  • My take? We're on the housing bottom. There will not be
    significant national drops in home prices from here. It's not going to
    get worse than it is. It is, however, going to stay bad for another
    nine months, so there's a significant buying window here. Not that I'm
    a real estate expert, mind you.


Same recommendation today, if you're going to buy, buy. Don't
try to time the market. It's a fool's game.

Monday, June 23, 2008

First Day of Summer



  • Although it may have felt like it for a long time, today is
    actually the first trading day of summer. Everyone is watching crude
    oil prices, as the Saudis have indicated that they will increase
    production, possibly dramatically, by the end of 2009.
  • Problem with that is, markets were hoping for a bigger increase,
    and Saudi Arabia doesn't have the kind of crude the world wants. Turns
    out the big producers of light, sweet crude are in Nigeria, Venezuela,
    and - get this - Iraq. Iraq is not entirely back on line yet,
    Venezuela is the home of one of the world's last real tin-pot
    dictators, and Nigeria is in the middle of a civil war.
  • Markets are pricing in further increases in oil, and waiting for
    the Fed meeting which kicks off tomorrow. The Fed is virtually
    guaranteed not to do anything with rates, but you never know.
  • Bonds, on the open, are absolutely flat. It's hard to see
    anything moving us dramatically today, given the flood of economic news
    later in the week.

For today, as we usually recommend, if you're going to buy, buy. Don't
try to time the market. It's a fool's game.



Thanks to those that came to the CJ Group BBQ this last weekend - it
was a hoot and a holler. Nice to meet so many RateWatchers, and we
look forward to seeing you again. And welcome to practically the
entire cast of Draper Arts Council's You Can't Take it With You,
a great show Jeanette and I caught on Friday. You wanna go, there's
info here.
You won't regret it if you do.

Thursday, June 19, 2008

RateWatch Midday Update

This isn't a big deal, because markets aren't moving much, but it
illustrates one of the problems with market forecasting. The Philly
Fed number came in below estimates, but apparently the market estimates
weren't real, because, and I quote from CNBC, "I think we all knew the
estimates were going to be wrong."



What the heck is that about? If your estimates really aren't your estimates, then what are they?



Related to this is the upcoming trial of two Bear Stearns hedge fund
managers, arrested today, that are accused of bilking their clients out
of millions by telling them that the subprime market wasn't going to
collapse when they really thought it was. The prosecution's evidence
for this is a couple of emails back and forth where these guys say
stuff like "man, this looks bad". Well, it DID look bad. Turns out it
WAS bad. But I myself was saying as recently as February that there
were signs of recovery in credit markets. Last year I was saying that
any broker that made it to the first of 2008 was going to be fine, as
things began to turn around. Nobody knew the markets were going to be
this bad this long.



I want to underscore the difficulties here. Nobody actually knows what
the market is going to do. Nobody. Not Warren Buffet, not George
Soros, nobody. People guess wrong and lose money. It happens all the
time. Advisors screw up and cost their clients. I suppose that some
of them do it on purpose, but why, exactly, would you? Where is the
incentive to destroy your portfolio and lose your clients millions?
This seriously smacks of scapegoating, looking for someone on whom to
take out general frustrations. Maybe there's real malfeasance here,
but boy, I'm having trouble seeing it.



My father has a saying that I really like: if incompetence is the
possible explanation for some action, it's a waste of time looking for
another one.



Bonds are down.